Clean Energy Can Be Deployed Quicker And Cheaper Than Fossil Fuels

Last Updated: 2/7/25

As energy demand rises, evidence points to clean energy as the most economical solution. Clean energy projects are faster and cheaper to deploy than fossil fuels, with solar and onshore wind farms typically taking less than two years to build, compared to four years for gas-fired power plants. Major utility companies have acknowledged this as well: in a recent investor presentation, NextEra Energy said the most economical answer to America’s power needs is to build renewables for energy and storage, noting that clean energy had a faster deployment timeline than all other types of power generation. 

Clean energy has also proven to be scalable, and record growth in renewables has driven cost-competitiveness with fossil fuels. In 2023, 81 percent of new renewable energy capacity produced electricity more cheaply than fossil fuels. Clean energy systems are also cheaper to operate and maintain. The lifetime costs of onshore wind projects were 67 percent lower than fossil fuel power plants and the lifetime costs of solar projects were 56 percent lower. Clean energy is an efficient and cost-effective solution to meet our energy needs that will also help mitigate the climate impacts of power generation.

Clean Energy Is Faster And Cheaper To Deploy Than Fossil Fuels

Natural Gas And Nuclear Systems Are Slow To Build

Clean Energy Systems Are Cheaper To Operate And Maintain

Record Growth In Clean Energy Is Driving Cost-Competitiveness With Fossil Fuels